Skip to Main Content

IMAGING VULNERABILITY IN NEURODEGENERATION

October 27, 2025
ID
13555

Transcript

  • 00:03Hi. Our next speaker is
  • 00:04doctor Carolyn Fredericks.
  • 00:06She graduated from Brown University
  • 00:08and completed her medical training
  • 00:10at Stanford,
  • 00:11Johns Hopkins Hospital, and UCSF
  • 00:13specializing in neurology
  • 00:15and did a fellowship in
  • 00:16behavioral neurology at the UCSF
  • 00:19memory and aging center. Her
  • 00:21lab uses multimodal neuroimaging to
  • 00:23better understand the relationship between
  • 00:25functional circuitry,
  • 00:27neurodegenerative
  • 00:28pathology, and symptom trajectory in
  • 00:30people with preclinical neurodegenerative symptoms.
  • 00:33And, clinically, she sees individuals
  • 00:35with a variety of cognitive
  • 00:37and behavioral complaints, including those
  • 00:39with less common variants of
  • 00:40neurodegenerative
  • 00:41disease.
  • 00:48Thanks so much for having
  • 00:49me.
  • 00:51So I'm gonna talk to
  • 00:52you a little bit about
  • 00:52what I consider the dimension
  • 00:54of vulnerability in Alzheimer's disease
  • 00:55and related dementia. So if
  • 00:57all of you picture someone
  • 00:58with Alzheimer's, you're probably picturing
  • 00:59someone elderly with short term
  • 01:01memory deficits,
  • 01:02but there's also this period
  • 01:03before that onset of clinical
  • 01:05illness, right, where someone has
  • 01:06a lot of Alzheimer's pathology
  • 01:07in the brain, especially amyloid,
  • 01:09but doesn't have clinically recognizable
  • 01:11symptomatology
  • 01:12yet. And even before that,
  • 01:13there are groups of people
  • 01:14who are much more vulnerable
  • 01:15for a variety of reasons.
  • 01:17So we're interested in that
  • 01:18entire dimension in the lab.
  • 01:20Many of you may know
  • 01:21that age is the single
  • 01:21biggest risk factor for Alzheimer's
  • 01:23disease. You may not know
  • 01:24that female sex is number
  • 01:26two and that even common
  • 01:27genotypes that we've all we're
  • 01:29all aware of like the
  • 01:29APOE4
  • 01:30allele, heterozygotes where women have
  • 01:32much more risk than men
  • 01:33do, so we're interested in
  • 01:35vulnerability
  • 01:36like that as well. And
  • 01:37in the next few minutes
  • 01:38I'm going to take you
  • 01:39on a bit of a
  • 01:40whirlwind tour of several projects
  • 01:41in my lab that look
  • 01:42at vulnerability,
  • 01:43from different different dimensions.
  • 01:46The first we'll talk about
  • 01:47what the functional connectome can
  • 01:48tell us about vulnerability to
  • 01:49Alzheimer's disease and how that
  • 01:51may actually present some opportunities.
  • 01:53Next, we'll talk a little
  • 01:53bit more about why women
  • 01:54may be at greater risk
  • 01:55for aggressive Alzheimer's disease.
  • 01:57We'll take a detour away
  • 01:58from Alzheimer's and into the
  • 01:59world of alpha synucleinopathy,
  • 02:01and in particular, the preclinical
  • 02:03state of alpha synucleinopathy called
  • 02:04REM behavior disorder.
  • 02:05And then I also wanna
  • 02:06touch on some really exciting
  • 02:07work by my colleagues at
  • 02:09the Pet Center looking at
  • 02:10the relationship between perfusion and
  • 02:11tau.
  • 02:13So to start off with
  • 02:14in terms of the functional
  • 02:15connectome and what it can
  • 02:16tell us about vulnerability to
  • 02:18Alzheimer's disease, The work I'm
  • 02:19gonna share with you is
  • 02:20spearheaded by a graduate student
  • 02:22in my and Todd Constable's
  • 02:23lab who just defended defended
  • 02:24his dissertation, Hamid Abu Warda.
  • 02:26And Hamid took advantage of
  • 02:28a technique developed by Todd
  • 02:29Constable's group called connectome based
  • 02:31predictive modeling, which many of
  • 02:32you here may be familiar
  • 02:33with, essentially a linear machine
  • 02:35based machine learning based model
  • 02:37that allows us to predict
  • 02:38measures like how the edges
  • 02:40of the functional connectome can
  • 02:41predict fluid intelligence or scores
  • 02:43on cognitive or functional
  • 02:45behavioral assays.
  • 02:47For me, it had the
  • 02:47idea that perhaps we could
  • 02:48use this method to predict
  • 02:50pathology instead.
  • 02:51So in people in this
  • 02:52preclinical cohort, this is from
  • 02:54the A four study, which
  • 02:55is a study of anti
  • 02:56amyloid antibody in people with
  • 02:57preclinical Alzheimer's disease, The study
  • 02:59unfortunately failed, but the data
  • 03:00were released to the research
  • 03:02community.
  • 03:02So we have this huge
  • 03:03cohort of people in this
  • 03:04preclinical stage of disease, and
  • 03:06Hameed developed models based on
  • 03:07the connections between the brain
  • 03:09from fMRI to see if
  • 03:10we could predict focal tau
  • 03:11in different regions of the
  • 03:12brain.
  • 03:13And now you might expect
  • 03:14that we'd be best at
  • 03:15predicting tau in the very
  • 03:16early Brock stage regions of
  • 03:17the brain, such as entorhinal
  • 03:19cortex,
  • 03:19perhepocampal
  • 03:20gyrus, because these people are
  • 03:21so early in illness. That
  • 03:23is not what we found,
  • 03:23and those models were actually
  • 03:25some of the worst performing
  • 03:26that Hamid built, and those
  • 03:27are in the blue box.
  • 03:28Instead, we were best able
  • 03:29to model tau in regions
  • 03:30like the posterior cingulate and
  • 03:32precuneus,
  • 03:33which are important hubs in
  • 03:34the default mode network, a
  • 03:35network that seems to be
  • 03:36preferentially targeted in Alzheimer's and
  • 03:37that's observed short term memory
  • 03:39function, but also are two
  • 03:40of the biggest brain hubs
  • 03:41just in general,
  • 03:43in terms of the sheer
  • 03:44number and importance of connections
  • 03:45they have with other brain
  • 03:46regions. So in retrospect, it
  • 03:48may make sense that we're
  • 03:49able to use the functional
  • 03:50connectome best to predict tau
  • 03:51in areas with the most
  • 03:52functional connections.
  • 03:54So building on that work,
  • 03:55Mead wanted to move forward
  • 03:57and see if we could
  • 03:58identify,
  • 03:59based on these functional connections,
  • 04:01patients who might be more
  • 04:02vulnerable to aggressive disease or
  • 04:03patients who might benefit from
  • 04:05specific treatments.
  • 04:06And to do this, I
  • 04:07should also say he he
  • 04:08took this work and externally
  • 04:09validated it in a clinical
  • 04:11cohort, the ADNI cohort. So
  • 04:12these models still apply for
  • 04:14people who have clinical disease,
  • 04:15not just preclinical.
  • 04:18So moving forward, he used
  • 04:19a clustering approach that was,
  • 04:21actually pioneered by Leanne Williams
  • 04:23right here at Yale and
  • 04:23published in Nature Medicine last
  • 04:25summer, and that essentially uses
  • 04:27the functional connectivity scores of
  • 04:28individuals that were derived from
  • 04:30connectome based predictive modeling and
  • 04:32puts them into clusters based
  • 04:33on how much their edge
  • 04:34weights resemble each other. So
  • 04:36for our particular study, the
  • 04:37best model was, was a
  • 04:39two cluster model.
  • 04:41And no need to read
  • 04:42through this in-depth, but just
  • 04:43to say that the patients
  • 04:44who were in cluster one
  • 04:45versus cluster two didn't differ
  • 04:46in terms of their APOE
  • 04:47status or how much amyloid
  • 04:48they had in the brain.
  • 04:49None of these sort of
  • 04:50obvious factors that you might
  • 04:52measure.
  • 04:53However, when he looked at
  • 04:54where their tau was, and
  • 04:55again these clusters were derived
  • 04:56using the functional edges only,
  • 04:59they look quite different. So
  • 05:00cluster one is individuals who
  • 05:01have a very typical distribution
  • 05:03of tau for someone with
  • 05:04early Alzheimer's disease. They have
  • 05:05a lot of it in
  • 05:06the limbic regions, mesial and
  • 05:07lateral temporal lobes. Cluster two
  • 05:09looks really different, right?
  • 05:11Even if you're not a
  • 05:12brain imager you can appreciate
  • 05:13that there's there's a bunch
  • 05:14more tau in these these
  • 05:16cortical regions, especially the parietal
  • 05:18nodes that we talked about
  • 05:19before,
  • 05:19that are such important brain
  • 05:21hubs.
  • 05:22So Hamid next asked so
  • 05:23the a four study, again,
  • 05:24is the dataset we're using.
  • 05:25They had a bunch of
  • 05:26people who were just kept
  • 05:27on placebo through the course
  • 05:28of the study, so we
  • 05:29can sort of see what
  • 05:29the natural history is for
  • 05:31people who are in cluster
  • 05:32one or cluster two based
  • 05:33on their functional connectomes at
  • 05:34baseline.
  • 05:36And what he found is
  • 05:37that both groups do more
  • 05:38poorly over time as you
  • 05:39would expect for anyone with
  • 05:40Alzheimer's disease,
  • 05:42but that cluster one has
  • 05:43a much slower progression, the
  • 05:44ones with the typical tau
  • 05:45distribution, whereas cluster two has
  • 05:47a much more dramatic decline
  • 05:49on this primary out endpoint,
  • 05:51composite cognitive measure that the
  • 05:53a four study reports, the
  • 05:54PAC.
  • 05:56This is the data from
  • 05:57the entire phase three,
  • 05:59study that that report of
  • 06:00the negative study. So solanizumab
  • 06:02in general failed to delay
  • 06:03cognitive decline. You can see
  • 06:03there's no separation between the
  • 06:03placebo and decline. You can
  • 06:04see there's no separation between
  • 06:06the placebo and solenozumab groups
  • 06:08at any point.
  • 06:09And this was an expensive
  • 06:10study too, so a big
  • 06:12disappointment to all of us
  • 06:13in the field. What if
  • 06:15you look at how people
  • 06:16do in cluster one versus
  • 06:17cluster two on the drug?
  • 06:19And this fascinated us. So
  • 06:20if you look at people
  • 06:21with that typical tau pattern,
  • 06:23they show a similar response
  • 06:24or lack of response to
  • 06:25the drug as the overall
  • 06:26study did. But when you
  • 06:27look at those people with
  • 06:28the more aggressive clinical course
  • 06:30and that cortical pattern of
  • 06:31tau who ended up sorted
  • 06:33into cluster two, they actually
  • 06:34do really well on this
  • 06:36drug.
  • 06:36So they have a forty
  • 06:37eight percent reduction in cognitive
  • 06:39decline on solenozumab
  • 06:40versus placebo, and this is
  • 06:41about a third of those
  • 06:42who enrolled in the study.
  • 06:44Hamid then went back and
  • 06:45looked at how much tau
  • 06:46was in that that region
  • 06:48that includes the precuneus and
  • 06:49posterior cingulate. And it turns
  • 06:51out that individuals who had
  • 06:52a high baseline level of
  • 06:54tau in those regions are
  • 06:55the ones who benefit most
  • 06:56from the drug, as you
  • 06:57can see in this heat
  • 06:58map here.
  • 07:00So we're really excited about
  • 07:01this finding, and I think
  • 07:02that it'll be,
  • 07:03it has the potential to
  • 07:04open up a new era
  • 07:05where we can use fMRI
  • 07:06to identify individuals who may
  • 07:08more be maybe more vulnerable
  • 07:09to aggressive disease or may
  • 07:11be more responsive to specific
  • 07:12treatments,
  • 07:13at a fraction of the
  • 07:14cost of Taupep.
  • 07:18Moving on and and turning
  • 07:19completely to a different topic,
  • 07:21we are also very interested
  • 07:22in why women are at
  • 07:23more risk for aggressive AD,
  • 07:24and this is work that
  • 07:25I did soon after my
  • 07:26arrival at Yale with Bronte
  • 07:28Fisiktani, who is now an
  • 07:29MD and about to start
  • 07:30her psychiatry residency after graduating
  • 07:32from the University of Washington.
  • 07:34And what Bronte and I
  • 07:35did was we looked at
  • 07:35the Human Connectome Project Aging
  • 07:37study, which looks at healthy
  • 07:38men and women over the
  • 07:39course of aging and obtains
  • 07:40very high quality fMRI, we
  • 07:42found this interesting pattern where
  • 07:43these posterior nodes in the
  • 07:44default mode network, again the
  • 07:46network that serves short term
  • 07:47memory performance and that seems
  • 07:49to be especially targeted in
  • 07:50amnestic disease,
  • 07:51they have higher connectivity than
  • 07:53men do in the posterior
  • 07:54nodes of that network. We
  • 07:55broke it down by, by
  • 07:57decade and found that this
  • 07:58was especially for women in
  • 07:59their 50s, which of course
  • 08:00is an interesting time in
  • 08:01the reproductive life cycle for
  • 08:03most women. This pattern still
  • 08:05holds in the preclinical a
  • 08:06four data set, So women
  • 08:08who actually have amyloid pathology
  • 08:09in their brains, if anything,
  • 08:10have more so, this posterior
  • 08:12hyperconnectivity.
  • 08:14And now a very talented
  • 08:15grad student in the lab,
  • 08:16Jordan Galbraith, is taking this
  • 08:18idea
  • 08:19and looking into hormone levels
  • 08:21in perimenopause
  • 08:22to see whether levels of
  • 08:23estrogen or FSH might correspond
  • 08:25to some of these connectivity
  • 08:26changes in women who are
  • 08:27about to go through the
  • 08:28menopausal transition and finding that,
  • 08:30in fact, connectivity in the
  • 08:31default mode network seems to
  • 08:33correlate tightly with higher levels
  • 08:34of FSH in perimenopause.
  • 08:37I think that I am
  • 08:38going too slowly, so I'm
  • 08:39going to skip our detour,
  • 08:42into alpha synuclein,
  • 08:44but I would be delighted
  • 08:45to talk about this work,
  • 08:46which is in collaboration with
  • 08:47Al Powers with our graduate
  • 08:48student, Rena Vine, if we
  • 08:50have time in the questions.
  • 08:52And instead, I will share
  • 08:53with you a little bit
  • 08:54about,
  • 08:55the use of MK sixty
  • 08:56two forty by two colleagues
  • 08:58in the pet center, Nicola
  • 08:59Aigel and Meva Daneout.
  • 09:02MK sixty two forty is
  • 09:03a second generation tau tracer.
  • 09:05It has a lot of
  • 09:06selectivity and high affinity for
  • 09:07tau, and it also shows
  • 09:08relatively fast brain penetration,
  • 09:10which allows us to use
  • 09:11the early phase of dynamic
  • 09:13scans to derive this r
  • 09:15one parameter that essentially is
  • 09:16an index of relative brain
  • 09:17perfusion.
  • 09:18And Nicola and Meva and
  • 09:19their group have shown that
  • 09:20these R1 values reveal regional
  • 09:22perfusion differences in people with
  • 09:24Alzheimer's disease, including earlier stages,
  • 09:26and cognitively unimpaired individuals, and
  • 09:28that those correlate strongly with
  • 09:30fifteen o water PET. So
  • 09:31this is is supporting its
  • 09:33uses to surrogate marker marker
  • 09:34of perfusion.
  • 09:36And that means that essentially
  • 09:37if we get an MK
  • 09:38scan we can measure both
  • 09:39perfusion and tau single scan
  • 09:40with no added cost or
  • 09:42dose.
  • 09:43What's very cool is the
  • 09:44work that they've done in
  • 09:45dizzy across disease stages of
  • 09:46AD. So on the left
  • 09:48you see controls who don't
  • 09:49have amyloid in their brains
  • 09:50there's no consistent correlation between
  • 09:52perfusion that r1 parameter and
  • 09:53tau, but then if you
  • 09:55look at individuals
  • 09:56with preclinical AD like the
  • 09:57a four cohort we were
  • 09:58talking about before you can
  • 10:00see that higher perfusion is
  • 10:01actually linked with early tau
  • 10:02deposition, and this is thought
  • 10:04to be maybe a compensatory
  • 10:05response. Once you get into
  • 10:06clinical illness in the patients
  • 10:08with mild cognitive impairment and
  • 10:09AD, high tau is associated
  • 10:11with low perfusion, which might
  • 10:12reflect a breakdown of that
  • 10:14compensatory
  • 10:15process and a shift towards
  • 10:16neurodegeneration
  • 10:17and decline.
  • 10:18So taken together, r one
  • 10:19seems to serve as a
  • 10:20dual marker, compensation in early
  • 10:21disease and dysfunction in later
  • 10:23stages.
  • 10:25With that, I want to
  • 10:26thank all of you for
  • 10:27for your attention and our
  • 10:28sponsors and collaborators and the
  • 10:30members of the lab. Thanks
  • 10:31so much.