Structural Racism Linked to Lung Cancer Care Disparities
Publication Title: County-Level Structural Racism Indices and Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Care.
Summary
- Question
This study examined whether structural racism at the county level influences racial disparities in the care and outcomes of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the most common type of lung cancer. The researchers investigated two measures of structural racism: deprivation (the Structural Racism Effect Index, SREI) and racial dissimilarity (County Structural Racism Index, CSR). They aimed to assess how these measures relate to differences in early diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and survival rates between Black and white patients.
- Why it Matters
NSCLC is a leading cause of cancer deaths, and Black patients consistently experience worse outcomes than white patients. Understanding how structural racism—defined as systemic inequities embedded in societal institutions—affects these disparities is critical for improving care equity. By identifying how factors such as county-level resources and racial inequities impact lung cancer care, this research could guide efforts to reduce racial health disparities and improve survival rates for Black patients.
- Methods
The researchers conducted a cross-sectional analysis of over 54,000 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with NSCLC between 2013 and 2019. Participants were aged 67 or older and identified as either non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic white. The study linked patient data with county-level measures of structural racism, including the SREI (a measure of resource deprivation) and the CSR (a measure of racial inequity across domains like housing and education). They examined three outcomes: diagnosis at an early stage, receipt of stage-appropriate care, and two-year survival.
- Key Findings
Black patients fared worse than white patients across all outcomes. They were less likely to be diagnosed at an early stage (30.9% vs. 38.4%), receive stage-appropriate treatment (20.3% vs. 28.0%), and survive two years after diagnosis (28.7% vs. 36.6%). Counties with higher structural racism, as measured by the CSR, were associated with wider survival gaps between Black and white patients. For example, in counties with the highest racial dissimilarity, the two-year survival rate for Black patients was 26.8%, compared to 36.8% for white patients—a 10% disparity. Statistically significant racial disparities were observed (P < .05).
- Implications
These findings highlight the role of structural racism in perpetuating health inequities. While white patients’ outcomes sometimes improved in counties with high racial inequity, Black patients’ outcomes did not show similar benefits. This suggests that systemic inequities disproportionately disadvantage Black patients, even within the same geographic regions. Addressing these disparities requires targeting structural factors, such as inequities in housing, education, and healthcare access, to improve cancer care quality and equity.
- Next Steps
- The authors recommend further research to refine measurements of structural racism and explore its impact on other racial and ethnic groups. They also suggest evaluating interventions aimed at reducing systemic inequities in cancer care and outcomes.
- Funding Information
- This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (award R01MD017569) and the National Cancer Institute (award R01HL164116). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Yale University also provided funding and support for this research.
Full Citation
Authors
Jacquelyne Gaddy, MD, MSc, MSCR
First AuthorAssistant Professor
Cary P Gross, MD
Last AuthorProfessor of Medicine (General Medicine) and of Epidemiology (Chronic Diseases)