Skip to Main Content

Research Gaps in Acute Pain Management in People with Opioid Use Disorder: Results from a Systematic Review: IMPOWR-YOU webinar

May 08, 2025

Research Gaps in Acute Pain Management in People with Opioid Use Disorder: Results from a Systematic Review: IMPOWR-YOU webinar

ID
13114

Transcript

  • 00:13And we're gonna be joined
  • 00:15by,
  • 00:17doctor Michelle Bernora,
  • 00:19who is assistant professor
  • 00:21of medicine at, Einstein School
  • 00:23of Medicine,
  • 00:25and doctor Melissa Weimer, who's
  • 00:26an associate professor of medicine
  • 00:29at Yale School of Medicine
  • 00:30and also director of the
  • 00:31Yale Addiction Medicine Consult Service.
  • 00:34And,
  • 00:35this work is,
  • 00:37they're gonna be presenting their
  • 00:38work
  • 00:39that stems from a recently
  • 00:41published,
  • 00:42paper
  • 00:43that I will share briefly
  • 00:44in the chat.
  • 00:46But the title of which
  • 00:47is research gaps and acute
  • 00:50pain management in people with
  • 00:51opioid use disorder,
  • 00:53results from a systematic review.
  • 00:56And,
  • 00:57I'm really pleased at the
  • 00:59way this has turned out.
  • 01:00And I think one of
  • 01:01the
  • 01:02take home messages,
  • 01:03especially for all the junior
  • 01:05investigators on on today is,
  • 01:08the incredible amount of work
  • 01:10there is for you all
  • 01:11to do over the rest
  • 01:12of your career.
  • 01:14One of the things I
  • 01:16like to highlight
  • 01:17for,
  • 01:18junior faculty is
  • 01:20how beneficial doing a systematic
  • 01:22review early on can be
  • 01:24because,
  • 01:25Michelle,
  • 01:27at this point is now
  • 01:28the world's expert,
  • 01:30in this topic because she
  • 01:31knows all of the literature.
  • 01:33And, you know, that happened
  • 01:35within a year or two.
  • 01:37And then,
  • 01:38she's also,
  • 01:39you know, well aware of
  • 01:41what are the unanswered questions
  • 01:42in the field.
  • 01:44And, she's got the rest
  • 01:45of her
  • 01:47career,
  • 01:48sort of in her research,
  • 01:50mapped out. So
  • 01:52think about it as you
  • 01:53think about ways when you
  • 01:55start your career. But,
  • 01:57without saying more,
  • 01:59I will introduce both Michelle
  • 02:01and Melissa. Thank you.
  • 02:05Thanks, David.
  • 02:06I'm just gonna say a
  • 02:08few words, and then I'm
  • 02:09gonna really hand it over
  • 02:10to Michelle who's gonna lead
  • 02:12us through the review.
  • 02:14I will also say that
  • 02:16systematic reviews are not always
  • 02:18for the faint of heart.
  • 02:20This,
  • 02:22topic,
  • 02:25idea started about,
  • 02:28I'm embarrassed to say, but,
  • 02:30probably about
  • 02:32four and a half, five
  • 02:33years ago.
  • 02:35And it took me,
  • 02:37a lot of time to
  • 02:38figure out
  • 02:39how to put it all
  • 02:40together and,
  • 02:42create the right team to
  • 02:44work on this
  • 02:46immensely important topic.
  • 02:49So sometimes you have brilliant
  • 02:50ideas, and it takes time
  • 02:52to get the right people
  • 02:53together. So,
  • 02:55thankfully,
  • 02:56Michelle
  • 02:57was interested in taking this
  • 02:59on and helping to lead
  • 03:00it,
  • 03:02And I think the product
  • 03:04was,
  • 03:05a
  • 03:07wonderful yet very,
  • 03:10time intensive process.
  • 03:13So, anyway,
  • 03:14excited for her to share
  • 03:16our findings. And as David
  • 03:18said, there's
  • 03:20literally an open field here.
  • 03:22You could essentially think of
  • 03:24any potential question,
  • 03:27and this topic in the
  • 03:28hospital, out of the hospital,
  • 03:30in so many different settings,
  • 03:32and
  • 03:33there's just so much potential
  • 03:35research that can be done.
  • 03:36So,
  • 03:37excited to share that with
  • 03:38you today.
  • 03:42Thanks, Melissa.
  • 03:45Yeah. As as David, mentioned,
  • 03:47my name is Michelle.
  • 03:49It's a pleasure to be
  • 03:50here.
  • 03:51I'm gonna share my slides
  • 03:52in just a second. But
  • 03:53before I start, I do
  • 03:54wanna encourage people. As Melissa
  • 03:57said, there are more gaps
  • 03:59than knowledge in this research
  • 04:00area, and so please don't
  • 04:01hesitate.
  • 04:03We've tried to make this
  • 04:04kind of as tangible and
  • 04:06useful of a talk for
  • 04:07folks.
  • 04:08But if anything comes up
  • 04:10for you as,
  • 04:11as we're speaking, just feel
  • 04:13free to interject or drop
  • 04:15it in the chat or
  • 04:15whatnot,
  • 04:16rather than waiting till the
  • 04:17end.
  • 04:19I think that that,
  • 04:20yeah, that would be great.
  • 04:24So let me just share
  • 04:25my slides. Bear with me
  • 04:26one second.
  • 04:36I think I just have
  • 04:37to switch.
  • 04:45Okay.
  • 04:46If I could just have
  • 04:47a thumbs up or down,
  • 04:48are you do you just
  • 04:49see my slide full screen?
  • 04:51Perfect. Okay. Great. Alright.
  • 04:55So right. Right, so research
  • 04:57gaps in acute pain management,
  • 04:59in people with opioid use
  • 05:00disorder results from a systematic
  • 05:02review.
  • 05:05So I have no disclosures.
  • 05:06I'm not sure if that
  • 05:07was necessary.
  • 05:09We are
  • 05:11planning to just describe the
  • 05:13current evidence base for strategies
  • 05:14to treat acute pain in
  • 05:16people with OUD according to
  • 05:17this recently published
  • 05:19review that Melissa and I
  • 05:20led. Identify
  • 05:22specific evidence gaps regarding strategies
  • 05:25to acute to treat acute
  • 05:26pain in people with OUD.
  • 05:28You'll see them interspersed throughout.
  • 05:30And then, hopefully, you can
  • 05:31walk away from this with,
  • 05:32you know, at least one
  • 05:33or two ideas for a
  • 05:35research project to address current
  • 05:37gaps,
  • 05:38if not many more than
  • 05:39that.
  • 05:41Just by way of background,
  • 05:43treating acute pain in people
  • 05:44with OUD is surprisingly common
  • 05:46and yet challenging to treat.
  • 05:49A systematic review and meta
  • 05:50analysis from last year found
  • 05:52the pooled prevalence of current
  • 05:53pain among people with OUD
  • 05:55as sixty percent.
  • 05:58Additionally, an estimated thirty percent
  • 06:00thirty six, I'm sorry, percent
  • 06:01of hospitalizations
  • 06:02among people with OUD are
  • 06:03for acutely painful conditions,
  • 06:07such as injection related infections
  • 06:10or trauma in addition to
  • 06:11painful conditions common among all
  • 06:13adults.
  • 06:15And then pain can be
  • 06:16challenging to treat in this
  • 06:17population for a few reasons,
  • 06:19including pain related sequelae from
  • 06:21long term exposure to opioids,
  • 06:23The fact that pain and
  • 06:24withdrawal can often co occur
  • 06:26and symptoms can be difficult
  • 06:27to distinguish between the two.
  • 06:29And then last because pharmacologic
  • 06:31properties
  • 06:32of the medications we use
  • 06:33for opioid use disorder can
  • 06:35affect the activity of pain
  • 06:36medications and often need to
  • 06:37be considered when you're coming
  • 06:39up with a plan for
  • 06:40your patient.
  • 06:43Additionally,
  • 06:44and important to not forget,
  • 06:47when treating acute pain in
  • 06:49people with OUD, it's important
  • 06:50to consider the patient perspective
  • 06:52and how,
  • 06:53the care they receive impacts
  • 06:55their overall well-being.
  • 06:56Qualitative data shows us that
  • 06:58people with OUD consistent
  • 07:00consistently report experiencing stigma and
  • 07:02perceived minimization of their pain
  • 07:04in acute care settings
  • 07:06and often avoid seeking medical
  • 07:07care altogether for fear of
  • 07:09mistreatment.
  • 07:12This is a quote that
  • 07:13I really like from, a
  • 07:15study a few years back,
  • 07:17in which,
  • 07:18sorry, the study was for
  • 07:20folks, undergoing bup initiations in
  • 07:22the ED. But, you know,
  • 07:24one participant said, I've had
  • 07:25emergency room doctors tell me
  • 07:26that I shouldn't be ashamed
  • 07:28of myself, just ashamed,
  • 07:30and belittled and mean to
  • 07:31feel, you know, as though
  • 07:32my pain is not real.
  • 07:36And so with that,
  • 07:39we,
  • 07:41oh, I'm so sorry. Last
  • 07:43last piece. Why should we
  • 07:44care about treating acute pain
  • 07:46in people with OUD? It's
  • 07:48important to note there are
  • 07:49multiple negative outcomes that are
  • 07:50associated with on or undertreated
  • 07:52acute pain for people with
  • 07:54OUD,
  • 07:55including poor engagement and retention,
  • 07:57MOUD care,
  • 08:00an increased likelihood of self
  • 08:01directed discharge, which itself is
  • 08:03associated with increased risk of
  • 08:05incomplete antibiotic regimens,
  • 08:08higher hospital readmission rates, morbidity,
  • 08:10mortality, and health care related
  • 08:12cost.
  • 08:15Alright.
  • 08:16And so with that, we
  • 08:17sought to better understand the
  • 08:19current evidence base by conducting
  • 08:21a systematic review about acute
  • 08:23pain management in people with
  • 08:24OUD.
  • 08:27Our key questions were, first,
  • 08:29among adults with OUD, including
  • 08:31those prescribed MOUD,
  • 08:33what are the benefits and
  • 08:35harms of opioid and non
  • 08:36opioid interventions for acute pain?
  • 08:38Secondly, among adults with OUD,
  • 08:40including those prescribed MOUD,
  • 08:42are interventions associated with OUD
  • 08:45related outcomes,
  • 08:46including withdrawal, return to use,
  • 08:48or treatment initiation and retention?
  • 08:51And then lastly, do the
  • 08:52benefits and harms of acute
  • 08:53pain interventions vary by use
  • 08:55of MOUD before or during
  • 08:57the acute pain episode?
  • 09:03This was our PICO framing,
  • 09:06understandably quite vague in the
  • 09:07beginning. I won't talk you
  • 09:08through all of it. I
  • 09:09think it's somewhat self explanatory,
  • 09:11most notably because the extent
  • 09:12of available evidence at the
  • 09:14time we start to, we
  • 09:15set out to do the
  • 09:16systematic review.
  • 09:18We were just a bit
  • 09:19uncertain,
  • 09:20and so we we designed
  • 09:22this intentionally quite broad.
  • 09:29We evaluated,
  • 09:31or we systematically,
  • 09:34extracted,
  • 09:35articles from any of these
  • 09:36sources listed here that were
  • 09:38published through July seventh of
  • 09:39twenty twenty four,
  • 09:41and use Citation Chaser,
  • 09:43as of the date of
  • 09:44our initial search, which was
  • 09:45March sixteenth twenty twenty three.
  • 09:51And this is our flow
  • 09:52diagram. I'm not sure if
  • 09:53you can
  • 09:55see in detail, and it's
  • 09:56not super important, but I
  • 09:57do think worth noting
  • 09:59that we started with almost
  • 10:01twenty thousand records identified
  • 10:03from online databases,
  • 10:05and we ended up including
  • 10:07only a hundred and fifteen
  • 10:08studies. And part of that
  • 10:09was because of the difficulty
  • 10:10in
  • 10:13in pulling,
  • 10:13acute pain,
  • 10:15interventions
  • 10:17in, from, you know, online
  • 10:19database source, sources.
  • 10:26Included studies represented those evaluating
  • 10:29a range of interventions
  • 10:31highlighted there across multiple different
  • 10:33patient populations,
  • 10:34grouped by MOUD treatment status,
  • 10:37and then across a number
  • 10:38of different painful conditions and
  • 10:40or settings.
  • 10:41And importantly, in sorting through
  • 10:43available evidence, we identified several
  • 10:45research gaps, which we're gonna
  • 10:47walk you through now.
  • 10:50First in each domain, we'll
  • 10:51talk you through what we
  • 10:52did find, and then we'll
  • 10:53highlight a notable gap or
  • 10:55or notably what we did
  • 10:56not find.
  • 11:00To make this most useful,
  • 11:01we'll organize this first by
  • 11:04population,
  • 11:05then by setting, and last
  • 11:07by intervention. Oh, I'm sorry.
  • 11:08It's intervention and setting, but
  • 11:11by those three,
  • 11:12domains,
  • 11:16and we'll sprinkle the rest
  • 11:17of it, and as it
  • 11:19relates to outcome and and
  • 11:20timing and and study design,
  • 11:22throughout as it's relevant.
  • 11:26So first,
  • 11:27a number of notable gaps,
  • 11:29emerged as it relates to
  • 11:30the study population.
  • 11:31We categorized our findings into
  • 11:33various subpopulations
  • 11:34based on OUD treatment status.
  • 11:37So notably, people who are
  • 11:38taking buprenorphine,
  • 11:39people who are taking methadone,
  • 11:42naltrexone,
  • 11:43or who are actively using
  • 11:45and not taking any medication
  • 11:46for opioid use disorder.
  • 11:48And so first,
  • 11:51we can talk about people
  • 11:53taking buprenorphine.
  • 11:54So,
  • 11:55the first intervention that became
  • 11:57apparent in,
  • 11:59our systematic review was, the
  • 12:01continuation
  • 12:02compared to discontinuation
  • 12:04of people who are taking
  • 12:05sublingual buprenorphine.
  • 12:07We found twelve,
  • 12:08controlled cohort studies with a
  • 12:10total n of one thousand
  • 12:11five hundred and twenty nine
  • 12:12study participants,
  • 12:15with a median baseline buprenorphine
  • 12:17dose reported in included studies
  • 12:19ranging from eight to sixteen
  • 12:21milligrams.
  • 12:23And then outcomes reported included
  • 12:25pain severity,
  • 12:26full agonist opioid analgesic use,
  • 12:28opioid cravings, and buprenorphine treatment
  • 12:30retention.
  • 12:35Notably,
  • 12:36no studies compared pain outcomes
  • 12:38with buprenorphine
  • 12:39continuation versus discontinuation
  • 12:41in people taking doses greater
  • 12:43than twenty four milligrams a
  • 12:45day. It is possible that
  • 12:47some cohorts included individual study
  • 12:49participants on doses higher, but
  • 12:52no study exclusively looked at
  • 12:54groups with,
  • 12:55twenty four or more milligrams
  • 12:57per day of their baseline
  • 12:58buprenorphine dose.
  • 13:00Secondly, only two small studies
  • 13:03compared OUD outcomes, so cravings,
  • 13:05return to use, or treatment
  • 13:07retention
  • 13:08with buprenorphine,
  • 13:09continuation compared to discontinuation of
  • 13:11any dose.
  • 13:13And so we thought that
  • 13:14was,
  • 13:15a notable,
  • 13:16gap in the literature.
  • 13:19Secondly,
  • 13:21we did,
  • 13:23look to see what the
  • 13:23evidence base was around, making
  • 13:26changes to someone's baseline sublingual
  • 13:28buprenorphine dose and or frequency,
  • 13:30and we found one case
  • 13:32report.
  • 13:33It described effective pain management
  • 13:35resulting from a temporary increase
  • 13:37of sublingual buprenorphine postoperatively
  • 13:40from twenty four milligrams at
  • 13:41baseline all the way to
  • 13:42seventy two milligrams daily that
  • 13:44was then tapered,
  • 13:46post hospital discharge.
  • 13:51Yeah.
  • 13:53And so,
  • 13:54the gap here is, that
  • 13:56no studies compared pain or
  • 13:58OUD outcomes associated with temporary
  • 14:01dose or frequency
  • 14:02changes to sublingual buprenorphine,
  • 14:05for example, split in the
  • 14:07same.
  • 14:08I'll just add,
  • 14:10sorry, going back that
  • 14:12though we categorized
  • 14:13case studies in our systematic
  • 14:15review, we didn't
  • 14:17include them in the decision
  • 14:19making or our findings.
  • 14:22So I think what's
  • 14:23helpful about our systematic review
  • 14:25is
  • 14:26we,
  • 14:28we tried to categorize all
  • 14:30of the research,
  • 14:32though,
  • 14:33really, the systematic review was
  • 14:34focused on controlled studies.
  • 14:36However, in our appendix, you'll
  • 14:38see
  • 14:39I think there are about
  • 14:41almost sixty case studies,
  • 14:43that we did include, and
  • 14:45that was important for
  • 14:48some of the categories
  • 14:50of patients who were, say,
  • 14:52on extended release buprenorphine
  • 14:53or extended release naltrexone or
  • 14:55oral naltrexone because there weren't
  • 14:57controlled studies on those populations.
  • 15:00So,
  • 15:01also, I think a helpful
  • 15:03resource, if you're doing work
  • 15:04in this area, would be
  • 15:05look at our appendix because
  • 15:07it's gonna show you,
  • 15:08albeit not not high level
  • 15:10of evidence, but it's gonna
  • 15:12show you case reports that
  • 15:13are out there for those
  • 15:14particular
  • 15:16modalities of treatment for OUD.
  • 15:21Yeah. Thanks, Melissa. That's Michelle,
  • 15:23can I can I just
  • 15:24ask a clarifying question?
  • 15:26Yeah. I think it's absolutely
  • 15:27fascinating. So you in you
  • 15:30included that case report of
  • 15:31dose increase.
  • 15:33I think it was a
  • 15:33letter or a case report
  • 15:35or something
  • 15:36of buprenorphine to treat acute
  • 15:37pain.
  • 15:38I and that was back
  • 15:40in two thousand seven. I
  • 15:41remember it very well. Are
  • 15:43you saying that nobody has
  • 15:45systematically evaluated
  • 15:47dose increases
  • 15:48for QPIP?
  • 15:49Not a single study. Wow.
  • 15:51I know. Thank you. I
  • 15:52know we were shocked as
  • 15:53well.
  • 15:54Also, interestingly,
  • 15:56most of the
  • 15:57perioperative
  • 15:58management of buprenorphine,
  • 16:01all of it has really
  • 16:02looked at potential dose reductions
  • 16:04or as Michelle
  • 16:05mentioned,
  • 16:09doses that don't go up
  • 16:10to what we're typically using
  • 16:12for patients now, which is
  • 16:13twenty four or thirty two
  • 16:14milligrams, or patients who are
  • 16:16on extended release
  • 16:17no.
  • 16:19Excuse me. Extended release buprenorphine.
  • 16:21So we really don't have
  • 16:25rigorous
  • 16:27research
  • 16:28to support what I do
  • 16:30in clinical practice, which is
  • 16:32I don't reduce the dose
  • 16:33of buprenorphine.
  • 16:34I keep the dose of
  • 16:35buprenorphine at twenty four milligrams
  • 16:38for patients who are
  • 16:40in the perioperative setting.
  • 16:42Now could we do a
  • 16:44retrospective
  • 16:44cohort study? Yes. We certainly
  • 16:46could. But that's an example
  • 16:48of we need research like
  • 16:50that, particularly in the,
  • 16:53in the clinical setting. If
  • 16:54you
  • 16:56are practicing that way and
  • 16:57you have a data source,
  • 16:59like, that would be a
  • 17:00great example of a study
  • 17:01that you could potentially think
  • 17:02about.
  • 17:06It looks like Shelley said
  • 17:08one of Jesse Merlin's EMPOWUR
  • 17:10study will examine bup up
  • 17:12to thirty two milligrams in
  • 17:13split dosing. So data in
  • 17:15a few years and chronic
  • 17:16pain, not acute pain.
  • 17:18So, yes. Right. Still still
  • 17:20an open research question.
  • 17:23Yeah. And I will add
  • 17:24anecdotally. I think I think
  • 17:26that you'll see this as
  • 17:27as we go throughout. But,
  • 17:29this is a an exciting
  • 17:32clinical and research area in
  • 17:33many ways because clinical practice
  • 17:36somewhat precedes and and expert
  • 17:37guidelines,
  • 17:39somewhat precede the evidence here.
  • 17:41Right?
  • 17:42Which was actually the intention
  • 17:43of my next slide, which
  • 17:44I don't think I need
  • 17:45to introduce to this audience,
  • 17:47but worth noting that the
  • 17:49idea of,
  • 17:50split dosing or temporary increases
  • 17:53is already,
  • 17:55recommended in expert,
  • 17:57guidance,
  • 17:58and being done in clinical
  • 17:59practice. So the fact that
  • 18:01we only find it on
  • 18:02a handful, in this case,
  • 18:03one case report,
  • 18:06I think is notable.
  • 18:10Okay.
  • 18:11Continuing on
  • 18:14to Melissa's point, we also
  • 18:16looked for any intervention in
  • 18:18people taking a long acting
  • 18:19injectable buprenorphine.
  • 18:21And although I will note,
  • 18:23that,
  • 18:24we're seeing an increase in
  • 18:26the number of publications
  • 18:28on this topic, they
  • 18:30are up until at least
  • 18:32July seventh twenty twenty four
  • 18:34limited to case reports and
  • 18:35series.
  • 18:36We found six in our
  • 18:38systematic review, and I won't
  • 18:39list them individually, but can
  • 18:41just kind of summarize
  • 18:43as a group they all
  • 18:44describe,
  • 18:45various effective
  • 18:46multimodal analgesic strategies,
  • 18:49many of which including included
  • 18:51the use of full agonist
  • 18:52opioid medications
  • 18:54in people,
  • 18:56taking long acting injectable buprenorphine
  • 18:58for OUD.
  • 19:00And so, again, the gap
  • 19:02here being,
  • 19:03no comparative studies have evaluated
  • 19:05any acute pain intervention, including,
  • 19:08adding on additional sublingual buprenorphine
  • 19:10in this group,
  • 19:11for people taking a long
  • 19:13acting injectable buprenorphine for OUD.
  • 19:19Okay.
  • 19:20Moving on. Our next subpopulation
  • 19:22being folks taking methadone for
  • 19:24OUD,
  • 19:27and
  • 19:28the practice of continuing methadone
  • 19:29versus discontinuing, I think, is
  • 19:31perhaps
  • 19:32less debated,
  • 19:33in terms of clinical practice
  • 19:35given the difference in the
  • 19:36pharmacologic properties of the two
  • 19:38medications.
  • 19:39However,
  • 19:40in this case as well,
  • 19:41we found one controlled cohort
  • 19:43study.
  • 19:46This was a a study
  • 19:47of twenty nine people on
  • 19:49methadone for OUD who were
  • 19:50hospitalized with acute pain,
  • 19:52which found that the mean
  • 19:53pain scores and cumulative morphine
  • 19:55doses required during the hospital
  • 19:58were similar between those who
  • 19:59continued versus discontinued
  • 20:01their usual methadone dose perioperatively.
  • 20:05However, notable that more people
  • 20:06who discontinued
  • 20:07their methadone received NSAIDs and
  • 20:10I beam ketamine,
  • 20:11and,
  • 20:12this study did not control
  • 20:13for those differences.
  • 20:15And so we we we
  • 20:16weren't able to make any
  • 20:17conclusions based on this for
  • 20:19the systematic review.
  • 20:24As it relates to changes
  • 20:26in baseline methadone dose and
  • 20:27or frequency, we did find
  • 20:29one uncontrolled cohort study in
  • 20:31one case series,
  • 20:32addressing this practice. The observational
  • 20:35study published in two thousand
  • 20:36and eight,
  • 20:37of sixty seven people on
  • 20:38methadone average dose of eighty
  • 20:40two milligrams
  • 20:42hospitalized with acute pain reported
  • 20:44that twelve percent had their
  • 20:45daily dose of methadone increased
  • 20:47during the stay, and premature
  • 20:49discharge was more common among
  • 20:50those who did not have
  • 20:51their methadone dose increased compared
  • 20:53to those who did. However,
  • 20:55no explicit pain outcomes were
  • 20:57compared between the two groups.
  • 20:59And then the case series
  • 21:00from two thousand one describes
  • 21:01six people taking methadone for
  • 21:03OUD with acute or subacute
  • 21:05cancer related pain,
  • 21:07and this just kinda describes
  • 21:08how they were able to
  • 21:09achieve pain control with increased
  • 21:11doses and or frequencies ranging
  • 21:13from every four to eight
  • 21:14hours
  • 21:15of oral methadone or the
  • 21:17administration in one case of
  • 21:19IV methadone.
  • 21:24And so the gap here,
  • 21:26no studies have compared pain
  • 21:28or OUD outcomes associated with
  • 21:30temporary increases in methadone dose
  • 21:32and or frequency,
  • 21:33I e split missing. So
  • 21:35similar to in the case
  • 21:36of buprenorphine.
  • 21:42I just pulled in. I
  • 21:43actually borrowed this table from
  • 21:45I adapted it from a
  • 21:46publication from, Dale Terasaki,
  • 21:50And just highlighting the fact
  • 21:52that,
  • 21:52again, similar to to buprenorphine,
  • 21:55this
  • 21:56practice of, temporarily making changes
  • 21:59to the methadone dose and
  • 22:00or frequency
  • 22:01is currently recommended by a
  • 22:03number of expert organizations,
  • 22:05and is already clinically in
  • 22:06practice,
  • 22:07or has been for many
  • 22:08years.
  • 22:13Okay.
  • 22:16So now we'll talk a
  • 22:17little bit about different interventions
  • 22:19that we came across in
  • 22:20the systematic
  • 22:22review. And so to refresh
  • 22:24everyone's memory, I'm talking about
  • 22:26the far left, column.
  • 22:30And we did in the
  • 22:31systematic review make a few,
  • 22:33conclusions with low strength of
  • 22:35evidence,
  • 22:37based on the presence of
  • 22:38at least one randomized clinical
  • 22:41trial with low,
  • 22:43risk of bias,
  • 22:45for interventions, which may improve
  • 22:48pain outcomes in people with
  • 22:49with opioid use disorder. And
  • 22:51so I've listed those three
  • 22:52here, and I'll go into
  • 22:53a time a bit more
  • 22:54detail for you.
  • 22:55So first,
  • 22:57p oclonidine.
  • 22:58So this was a single
  • 22:59RCT with a low risk
  • 23:01of bias conducted among seventy,
  • 23:04adults,
  • 23:05in Iran with OUD actively
  • 23:07using opium
  • 23:08who presented to the ED
  • 23:10for acute pain from an
  • 23:11orthopedic fracture.
  • 23:12Oriclclonidine
  • 23:13at zero point two milligrams
  • 23:15was found to decrease pain
  • 23:17severity up to an hour,
  • 23:20compared to placebo.
  • 23:23And that's what we found
  • 23:24for Keoclonidine.
  • 23:26A single RCT with a
  • 23:28low risk of bias,
  • 23:29conducted among eighty seven, adults
  • 23:32with OUD in Iran actively
  • 23:34using opium again presented to
  • 23:36the ED with acute traumatic
  • 23:37or non traumatic limb or
  • 23:39abdominal pain.
  • 23:41This study found that the
  • 23:43combination of I'm,
  • 23:45Haldol with I'm midazolam and
  • 23:47IV morphine
  • 23:48can decrease pain severity up
  • 23:50to six hours,
  • 23:51compared to IV morphine alone.
  • 23:55And then the third intervention,
  • 23:57we found a single randomized
  • 23:59clinical trial with a low
  • 24:00risk of bias,
  • 24:02conducted among a hundred and
  • 24:03eighty adults with OUD actively
  • 24:05using opium in Iran,
  • 24:08reporting that IV lidocaine administered
  • 24:11during general anesthesia,
  • 24:13may decrease postoperative pain severity
  • 24:16and full agonist opioid analgesic
  • 24:18use compared,
  • 24:20to IV ketamine or,
  • 24:22placebo. It was a three
  • 24:23arm study.
  • 24:27So there are many gaps
  • 24:28here. I've listed some of
  • 24:29them. I'm sure this is
  • 24:30not a complete list, But
  • 24:32for all of these interventions,
  • 24:33the optimal medication dosing and
  • 24:35duration remains unclear.
  • 24:37Their safety and efficacy in
  • 24:38people taking a medication for
  • 24:40OUD, notably all three trials
  • 24:42I just mentioned, were conducted
  • 24:43in people actively using opium.
  • 24:46And then the optimal clinical
  • 24:47setting or scenario,
  • 24:50in terms of what,
  • 24:51you know,
  • 24:53right, PACU being one example.
  • 24:55And then, none of these
  • 24:57studies looked at OUD OUD
  • 24:58related outcomes.
  • 24:59And so that's a notable
  • 25:00gap for every intervention
  • 25:03listed here.
  • 25:05We also came across some
  • 25:07interventions
  • 25:08with insufficient evidence,
  • 25:10and so I've listed some
  • 25:11of those here.
  • 25:13IT,
  • 25:14intra sorry. IT intrathecal,
  • 25:17clonidine,
  • 25:18IV dexmedetomidine.
  • 25:20I always say that wrong.
  • 25:22IV ketamine, and then various,
  • 25:25phlebotomist opioid medications,
  • 25:28and our conclusions regarding this
  • 25:30group of interventions
  • 25:32or these groups of interventions
  • 25:34was largely that evidence was
  • 25:35insufficient,
  • 25:37to make any conclusions.
  • 25:40Mostly, I should add, due
  • 25:41to heterogeneity
  • 25:42in either the study population,
  • 25:45the comparator,
  • 25:47or outcomes evaluated,
  • 25:49among studies reporting on these
  • 25:51interventions.
  • 25:56I do wanna spend a
  • 25:57minute touching on IV ketamine
  • 25:58because I feel this is
  • 25:59often,
  • 26:00an intervention of interest.
  • 26:04And so for for this,
  • 26:06intervention in particular, we did
  • 26:08find three RCTs,
  • 26:10two observational studies, and ten
  • 26:12case reports,
  • 26:14just reporting on the use
  • 26:15of IV ketamine for pain
  • 26:17in people with OUD.
  • 26:19All three RCTs
  • 26:21were conducted,
  • 26:23among predominantly male participants.
  • 26:26Two included
  • 26:27participants actively using opium, and
  • 26:29one included participants,
  • 26:32on methadone for OUD.
  • 26:34Pain conditions,
  • 26:36reported on included limb fractures
  • 26:38and postoperative pain, and then
  • 26:40all compared IV ketamine alone
  • 26:42or with an IV phle
  • 26:43agonist opioid compared to an
  • 26:45IV phle agonist opioid alone,
  • 26:48and findings were mixed.
  • 26:52In general,
  • 26:53there were reported improvements in
  • 26:55pain severity up to twenty
  • 26:57four hours following medication administration.
  • 27:02I'm sorry. Reported improvements were
  • 27:04similar or improved,
  • 27:06among those who received IV
  • 27:07ketamine compared to the IV
  • 27:09phlebotomist opioid,
  • 27:11that being either morphine or
  • 27:12fentanyl.
  • 27:14However, participants who received ketamine
  • 27:16also reported higher rates of
  • 27:18adverse events,
  • 27:20and I've listed the ones
  • 27:21specifically evaluated
  • 27:23here. So diplopia, nystagmus, agitation,
  • 27:25loss of consciousness,
  • 27:27nausea, vomiting, or confusion.
  • 27:35And so we ended up
  • 27:36concluding from the systematic review
  • 27:39that,
  • 27:40the scenarios in which the
  • 27:41benefits exceed the risks of
  • 27:43ketamine are unclear.
  • 27:46And so
  • 27:48that's a notable
  • 28:00gap. Okay.
  • 28:01And then lastly,
  • 28:03I did wanna spend a
  • 28:04minute touching on full agonist
  • 28:05opioid medications, and Melissa can
  • 28:07attest to this as well
  • 28:09as Leila. She's still,
  • 28:11here and listening. But we
  • 28:12had a really difficult time
  • 28:13making sense of our full
  • 28:15agonist opioid
  • 28:16medication data,
  • 28:19in terms of informing our
  • 28:20our systematic review.
  • 28:23And so
  • 28:24I'm just gonna summarize a
  • 28:26little bit.
  • 28:27We found four randomized clinical
  • 28:29trials, twenty five observational studies
  • 28:32that described any oral or
  • 28:34IV phle agonist opioid.
  • 28:39Three RCTs and six studies
  • 28:41described IV PCA,
  • 28:43and then the settings,
  • 28:44ranged from nonoperative to postoperative,
  • 28:47but they were all hospital
  • 28:48settings.
  • 28:50Importantly, study designs
  • 28:52varied as to whether the
  • 28:54full agonist opioid was the
  • 28:55intervention or the outcome.
  • 28:58And notably, a lot of
  • 28:59studies used full agonist opioid
  • 29:03dosing or requirement
  • 29:05as a proxy for pain
  • 29:06severity,
  • 29:07in terms of their evaluation
  • 29:09of a different
  • 29:10intervention.
  • 29:11And so it was kind
  • 29:12of a lot for us
  • 29:13to make sense of.
  • 29:19What I was able to
  • 29:20do is to summarize the
  • 29:22range of doses reported
  • 29:23by setting,
  • 29:25and then the n here
  • 29:26you see on the left
  • 29:27hand column is the number
  • 29:28of studies,
  • 29:30informing that range
  • 29:32that you see in the
  • 29:33right hand column.
  • 29:35And so
  • 29:39in nonoperative settings, the dosing
  • 29:41dosing range from eighteen to
  • 29:43seventeen morphine milligram equivalents per
  • 29:46day of PO and IV
  • 29:47full agonist opioids.
  • 29:49In postoperative settings,
  • 29:51twenty studies,
  • 29:53provided a range from forty
  • 29:55four to seven hundred ninety
  • 29:57three
  • 29:57morphine milligram equivalents per day
  • 29:59of phalagonist opioids.
  • 30:01Among two studies that reported
  • 30:04the,
  • 30:05phalagonist opioid dose,
  • 30:08among people receiving PCAs only.
  • 30:10The range was one fifty
  • 30:11five to two eighty two
  • 30:13MMEs per day.
  • 30:14And then
  • 30:16broken down by population, people
  • 30:17taking methadone or people taking
  • 30:19buprenorphine,
  • 30:21People taking methadone, nine studies
  • 30:23provided a range of five
  • 30:24to six hundred eighty eight
  • 30:26MMEs per day, and people
  • 30:28taking buprenorphine,
  • 30:29sixteen studies provided a range
  • 30:31of eighteen
  • 30:32to three hundred and eight
  • 30:33MMEs per day.
  • 30:37As you can note, the
  • 30:38range is quite wide regardless
  • 30:40of setting your population. And
  • 30:41I think,
  • 30:43when thinking about this, it's
  • 30:44important to note that studies
  • 30:45vary not only in the
  • 30:47type of acute pain studied
  • 30:48as well as the method
  • 30:50they use to calculate the
  • 30:51MME, as in whether or
  • 30:53not they included the methadone
  • 30:54or the buprenorphine
  • 30:55respectively
  • 30:56in their MME calculations,
  • 30:58and that this precluded conclusions
  • 31:00regarding,
  • 31:02any type of summative conclusion
  • 31:03we could make based on
  • 31:04the data provided.
  • 31:08Lastly, if we have enough
  • 31:09time, it looks like we
  • 31:10do.
  • 31:11I wanted to make a
  • 31:12quick note,
  • 31:13about
  • 31:14some studies directly compared the
  • 31:16full agonist opioid dosing between
  • 31:18people taking methadone and buprenorphine,
  • 31:20and this was one of
  • 31:21our questions when we set
  • 31:22out for the systematic review.
  • 31:25And for the most part,
  • 31:27they found that full agonist
  • 31:28opioid dosing generally did not
  • 31:30differ between these two populations,
  • 31:33with two exceptions in terms
  • 31:35of observational studies.
  • 31:37The first was a,
  • 31:41a low risk of bias,
  • 31:44comparative
  • 31:45observational cohort study
  • 31:47that looked at postoperative full
  • 31:49agonist
  • 31:50opioid use between a hundred
  • 31:52and ninety five people on
  • 31:53buprenorphine
  • 31:54eighty percent for OUD
  • 31:56and seven hundred and thirty
  • 31:57three people on methadone for
  • 31:59OUD.
  • 32:00And they found that those
  • 32:01taking buprenorphine had lower full
  • 32:03agonist opioid use across multiple,
  • 32:06I think over five different
  • 32:07sensitivity
  • 32:08analyses,
  • 32:09and one in which they
  • 32:10compared people with OUD taking
  • 32:13buprenorphine
  • 32:14specifically at doses greater than
  • 32:15sixteen milligrams
  • 32:17per day compared to people
  • 32:19taking methadone
  • 32:20with at least sixty milligrams
  • 32:22per day,
  • 32:23and then all of whom
  • 32:24continued their baseline MOUD.
  • 32:27The second study was,
  • 32:30a bit older. I don't
  • 32:31remember the year. I wanna
  • 32:32say two thousand seven.
  • 32:34Was an observational,
  • 32:35cohort study of forty seven
  • 32:37pregnant people taking methadone and
  • 32:39ninety nine people taking bupendorfine
  • 32:42for OUD who underwent cesarean
  • 32:44section
  • 32:45and reported that higher,
  • 32:47baseline doses of methadone but
  • 32:49not buprenorphine
  • 32:50were associated with higher inpatient
  • 32:52full agonist opioid use.
  • 32:56And so
  • 32:58primary gaps,
  • 33:00again, there are many,
  • 33:01but as it relates to
  • 33:02full agonist opioid medications,
  • 33:05we don't understand,
  • 33:07or
  • 33:08notable gaps, I guess you
  • 33:10could say include which medications
  • 33:12dosing and durations
  • 33:13might be best for which,
  • 33:15patient and clinical scenario.
  • 33:17No studies have evaluated opioid
  • 33:19use disorder outcomes associated with
  • 33:22the administration of FOL against
  • 33:23agonist opioid medications during acute
  • 33:25pain. And very few studies
  • 33:27compared the impact of full
  • 33:28agonist opioid medications
  • 33:30on pain or OUD outcomes
  • 33:32between different MOUD groups except
  • 33:34the two studies I mentioned.
  • 33:45And then lastly,
  • 33:47worth note,
  • 33:49it's worth talking about setting.
  • 33:50And so this was,
  • 33:53a very fun figure that
  • 33:55one of our coauthors made,
  • 33:57breaking down the different interventions
  • 34:00that we found in the
  • 34:01systematic review,
  • 34:03by setting,
  • 34:05similar to an evidence map,
  • 34:06I guess you could say.
  • 34:08And it's worth noting. So,
  • 34:10you you're seeing four quadrants.
  • 34:12The top left is,
  • 34:14interventions that looked at postoperative
  • 34:16pain in hospital settings.
  • 34:18Top right are the studies
  • 34:19looking at post labor or
  • 34:21post cesarean section pain in
  • 34:22hospital settings.
  • 34:24Bottom left, other acute pain
  • 34:26in hospital or ED settings.
  • 34:28And then lastly,
  • 34:29a group looking specifically at
  • 34:31orthopedic injuries in hospital or
  • 34:33ED settings.
  • 34:35And importantly,
  • 34:37we did not find a
  • 34:38single comparative study looking at
  • 34:40any acute pain intervention in
  • 34:42people with OUD in any
  • 34:43outpatient setting.
  • 34:45So every comparative study we
  • 34:47included in the systematic review
  • 34:49was conducted in hospital
  • 34:52setting. Although we did not,
  • 34:54I should mention, although we
  • 34:55did not look specifically for
  • 34:56hospital settings, our our our
  • 34:58search criteria was to include
  • 35:00all, and this is just
  • 35:01what we found.
  • 35:09And then I'll just close
  • 35:10with,
  • 35:11just perhaps an anecdote that
  • 35:12when we set out to
  • 35:13do the systematic review, we
  • 35:15convened a group of expert
  • 35:17clinicians and researchers in this
  • 35:18area, and we did identify
  • 35:20a number of research questions
  • 35:22we thought might be helpful
  • 35:23to answer with the systematic
  • 35:25review. We ended up,
  • 35:27structuring our key questions a
  • 35:29bit differently, but I do
  • 35:30think it's worth mentioning,
  • 35:32that, you know, these are
  • 35:33two notable questions I've pulled
  • 35:35on the screen here that
  • 35:36our expert group had thought
  • 35:37it would be useful to,
  • 35:40speak out evidence on, and
  • 35:42we did not find anything.
  • 35:46Right. So, for people with
  • 35:49opioid use disorder who are
  • 35:50not taking a medication,
  • 35:52does,
  • 35:53MOUD initiation
  • 35:54provide effective analgesia
  • 35:56during periods of acute pain?
  • 35:58And then secondly,
  • 36:00bit more broadly, how do
  • 36:01acute pain management strategies impact
  • 36:04OUD outcomes?
  • 36:06And I think that's an
  • 36:07important evidence gap.
  • 36:12And so
  • 36:13that rounds out the gaps
  • 36:14that we had identified.
  • 36:16I see a few chats
  • 36:18look like they've come in,
  • 36:18but I haven't been able
  • 36:19to look at them. Yeah.
  • 36:20No. No. No. No. Welcome
  • 36:22questions. Great. Thank you, Michelle.
  • 36:24Thank you, Melissa.
  • 36:26I'll read some of the
  • 36:27questions.
  • 36:29Starting off early on,
  • 36:32doctor Parker from the emergency
  • 36:34department and ASAP. Is there
  • 36:36any reported outcome data for
  • 36:38use of new
  • 36:39non opioid oral pain medications
  • 36:43for patients with
  • 36:44ongoing buprenorphine or methadone
  • 36:47and the change of in
  • 36:48pain?
  • 36:54Non opioid
  • 36:56oral pain medications.
  • 36:58So please feel free to
  • 37:00only read if you wanna
  • 37:01clarify. Or
  • 37:08I guess I was struck
  • 37:09also many of your competitors.
  • 37:11I think you included clonidine,
  • 37:13aldol, ketamine.
  • 37:14I didn't hear any nonsteroidals.
  • 37:18No.
  • 37:21Yes. I think that's right.
  • 37:22Sorry. I had not previously
  • 37:25thought of that as its
  • 37:26own class of medication missing,
  • 37:27but I think I think
  • 37:28you are right.
  • 37:30And I can tell
  • 37:33you perhaps by pulling up
  • 37:35this this is our table.
  • 37:40Yep.
  • 37:41That's single nodal.
  • 37:43Yeah. I think there were
  • 37:44there were some studies where
  • 37:47NSAID or
  • 37:48acetaminophen
  • 37:49may have been combined with
  • 37:50one of these other
  • 37:52interventions, but not as a
  • 37:54standalone intervention.
  • 37:58Yes. I think that's right.
  • 38:00Yeah. And,
  • 38:01Bruce may be referring
  • 38:04to, you know, the new
  • 38:06new approved non opioid treatment,
  • 38:09suzatrogine
  • 38:12or Jordanavex.
  • 38:13This is a non opioid,
  • 38:16pain medication
  • 38:17that was recently approved, but
  • 38:19I imagine
  • 38:20We did not recognize
  • 38:22any. No. Yep.
  • 38:25So,
  • 38:26next question,
  • 38:29from Adam Seidner. Was there
  • 38:31anything in the review about
  • 38:33adding
  • 38:34digital therapeutics,
  • 38:35virtual environments,
  • 38:37or any nonpharmacologic
  • 38:39interventions
  • 38:39to the pharmacologic interventions?
  • 38:42That's a great question.
  • 38:45I apologize. I did not
  • 38:46include that here. We came
  • 38:47across one,
  • 38:50and it was a
  • 38:52oh, jeez. Melissa, please correct
  • 38:54me if I'm wrong. It
  • 38:54was a virtual reality
  • 38:56administered. I think it was
  • 38:58a mindfulness
  • 38:59intervention,
  • 39:00but administered using a VR
  • 39:03headset,
  • 39:04that they did a pre
  • 39:06it was it was an
  • 39:07observational cohort study with no,
  • 39:10comparison group where they looked
  • 39:12at this rollout on an
  • 39:13orthopedic unit on a in
  • 39:15hospital setting and then just
  • 39:17kind of reported
  • 39:18a bit about pain
  • 39:20outcomes prior to rolling out
  • 39:21this virtual reality intervention and
  • 39:23then,
  • 39:26post rollout.
  • 39:27And they they did find
  • 39:28that pain outcomes were improved
  • 39:30after rolling out said,
  • 39:32intervention, but that was the
  • 39:34only one that we found
  • 39:37in conducting
  • 39:38this,
  • 39:39right, this,
  • 39:41systematic review. I think,
  • 39:44yeah, that brings up another
  • 39:45important
  • 39:46point or thing to keep
  • 39:48in mind. So
  • 39:49we were really focused in
  • 39:51this systematic review on opioid
  • 39:53use disorder, not opioid dependence.
  • 39:57So one of the challenges
  • 39:58of this systematic review is
  • 40:00within the literature,
  • 40:02there's a conflation of the
  • 40:03two that we found in
  • 40:05many of the studies.
  • 40:07So we really had to
  • 40:08grapple with this idea of
  • 40:11what is the population and
  • 40:12clearly defining the population. So
  • 40:15is this opioid dependence prescribed
  • 40:17long term opioids versus someone
  • 40:19with opioid use disorder?
  • 40:21And there were actually times
  • 40:23when
  • 40:24some of these studies included
  • 40:26both populations,
  • 40:27and so then we had
  • 40:28to decide if we would
  • 40:29include the study that had
  • 40:31both populations.
  • 40:33And so we chose
  • 40:35if there were enough people
  • 40:36with OUD in the study,
  • 40:39we we did choose to
  • 40:41include some of those studies,
  • 40:42but there were times where
  • 40:43it was so unclear that
  • 40:45we didn't include that study.
  • 40:47So I think there are
  • 40:48more studies
  • 40:50looking at individuals
  • 40:52who are prescribed long term
  • 40:54opioids who may might meet
  • 40:55that definition of opioid dependence
  • 40:58on some of the nonpharmacologic
  • 41:00interventions,
  • 41:01but not specifically in this
  • 41:03population of people with opioid
  • 41:05use disorder.
  • 41:11Thank you, Melissa. That's helpful
  • 41:13and an important distinction.
  • 41:15Patient Dow asked,
  • 41:17how was the co occurrence
  • 41:19of acute and chronic pain
  • 41:20handled in the review?
  • 41:21And, also, what share of
  • 41:23the studies in the review
  • 41:24were from the US?
  • 41:29Two very good questions.
  • 41:31So first, this is somewhat,
  • 41:35similar to Melissa's prior answer,
  • 41:37but we we notably did
  • 41:39not include studies
  • 41:41that,
  • 41:42had, for example, buprenorphine
  • 41:44prescribed for chronic pain without,
  • 41:46explicit mention of opioid use
  • 41:48disorder. And so we did
  • 41:49focus the population
  • 41:51on opioid use disorder
  • 41:53with acute pain.
  • 41:55Now
  • 41:57the co occurrence
  • 41:58of acute and chronic pain,
  • 42:01I'm sure that was represented
  • 42:03in our,
  • 42:04in the studies that we
  • 42:05included. But,
  • 42:10yeah, I guess
  • 42:14most of the outcomes I
  • 42:16guess,
  • 42:16to address your question, most
  • 42:18of the outcomes, even the
  • 42:19pain related outcomes were short
  • 42:21term,
  • 42:22and were focused specifically on
  • 42:24a
  • 42:25specific acute pain condition. We
  • 42:27didn't break up our studies
  • 42:29that way or the way
  • 42:30we reported our findings because
  • 42:31it was so
  • 42:32heterogeneous,
  • 42:34the largest perhaps subgroup being
  • 42:36postoperative
  • 42:37pain.
  • 42:40So I I I would
  • 42:42like to say that most
  • 42:43of the pain outcomes we
  • 42:44found and reported on were
  • 42:47specifically
  • 42:48for acute pain.
  • 42:50However,
  • 42:53is it likely acute on
  • 42:55chronic pain,
  • 42:56and is there a high
  • 42:57prevalence of chronic pain in
  • 42:59people with OUD? We know
  • 43:00the answer to that is
  • 43:01yes.
  • 43:02And so
  • 43:03I guess my assumption is
  • 43:05that chronic pain is at
  • 43:06play here, although we didn't
  • 43:07specifically find a way to
  • 43:09account for it in our
  • 43:10presentation results.
  • 43:13I would also add that
  • 43:14you'll see here
  • 43:16at the bottom
  • 43:17the different types of pain
  • 43:19that were included, and, notably,
  • 43:21men most of these
  • 43:25are surgical
  • 43:26or post surgical or some
  • 43:28type of injury.
  • 43:30So there
  • 43:31there was some acute nonsurgical
  • 43:33pain, but that was definitely
  • 43:35not
  • 43:36the
  • 43:38majority of these studies.
  • 43:40So if you're thinking about
  • 43:41individuals you're treating on a
  • 43:43general medical unit who, say,
  • 43:45have abdominal pain,
  • 43:48or pancreatitis
  • 43:49related pain, or, you know,
  • 43:51some other sort of medically
  • 43:53related pain condition,
  • 43:56which probably fits more of
  • 43:58that acute on chronic pain
  • 44:00that we you're thinking of.
  • 44:02There weren't many studies
  • 44:04of those
  • 44:05patients. So I think,
  • 44:07you know,
  • 44:08if somebody comes in with
  • 44:10an acute fracture, we're really
  • 44:11talking about acute pain. We're
  • 44:13not talking about chronic pain.
  • 44:16So I think that's another
  • 44:17area of potential
  • 44:21research would be for
  • 44:23more of the medically related
  • 44:25complex pain that we're seeing
  • 44:27in
  • 44:28generally,
  • 44:29you know, general medicine
  • 44:32settings.
  • 44:33And I get I guess,
  • 44:34Melissa, to that point, I,
  • 44:35you know, I'm not seeing
  • 44:36any
  • 44:37reports
  • 44:38of osteomyelitis
  • 44:40or abscesses,
  • 44:42you know,
  • 44:43and it I think what
  • 44:44I'm hearing is
  • 44:46those types of things that
  • 44:47you would presume would be
  • 44:49common among people receiving
  • 44:51MOUD
  • 44:52have not been represented
  • 44:54in the scientific literature as
  • 44:56causing acute pain or being
  • 44:58treated acutely.
  • 45:00Not in large comparative
  • 45:03well done studies with low
  • 45:05risk of bias. Correct.
  • 45:07Thank you.
  • 45:08They're all really limited to
  • 45:11case reports or case series.
  • 45:14But, you know, the patients
  • 45:16that we see
  • 45:17in the hospital who have
  • 45:19the osteo, who have the
  • 45:20endocarditis, who have the
  • 45:22spinal abscess,
  • 45:24we don't have a great
  • 45:26comparative
  • 45:27study about how to best
  • 45:29treat those individuals.
  • 45:34Michelle, so you mentioned OUD
  • 45:36outcomes, and I was just
  • 45:37gonna challenge you a little
  • 45:39bit. So what OUD outcomes
  • 45:41would you
  • 45:43be interested in looking at
  • 45:45and and what time window?
  • 45:48That's a great question.
  • 45:49It was one of our
  • 45:50main,
  • 45:51like, conclusions from our systematic
  • 45:54review, but I do
  • 45:56welcome
  • 45:57feedback.
  • 45:59Some study did report on
  • 46:00the presence of cravings,
  • 46:02short term,
  • 46:05mostly the randomized clinical trials
  • 46:08among people not prescribed,
  • 46:10MOUD, you see in the
  • 46:11right hand column.
  • 46:13But we did not we
  • 46:14noted we sorry. We notably
  • 46:16did not identify
  • 46:19many at all studies looking
  • 46:20at, either initiation or retention
  • 46:23in MOUD
  • 46:24treatment.
  • 46:25I think there was one
  • 46:27study that looked at buprenorphine
  • 46:29discontinuation
  • 46:30versus continuation at thirty day
  • 46:32retention.
  • 46:33But other than that, that
  • 46:34was the only one that
  • 46:35looked at retention post hospital
  • 46:37discharge,
  • 46:40return to use,
  • 46:41or maybe patterns of use
  • 46:45would be the two that
  • 46:47I think were most notably
  • 46:48missing.
  • 46:51And,
  • 46:52just to be clear, you're
  • 46:54thinking of post discharge or
  • 46:56post
  • 46:56resolution of the painful
  • 46:59Yes. Episode. Okay. Yes. I
  • 47:02I think part of that's
  • 47:03informed by a notable concern
  • 47:05you see among clinicians to
  • 47:06aggressively
  • 47:07treat acute pain among people
  • 47:09with OUD is worsening the
  • 47:11OUD,
  • 47:12either with return to use,
  • 47:15among people,
  • 47:17not currently using,
  • 47:19or some other, negative outcome
  • 47:21post the acute pain episode.
  • 47:24Mhmm. And we did not
  • 47:25find any studies specifically
  • 47:27looking at those outcomes.
  • 47:29And
  • 47:30another I should say. Yeah.
  • 47:32Another potential
  • 47:34surrogate marker could be premature
  • 47:36discharge,
  • 47:38or and and a lot
  • 47:40of the work that we've
  • 47:42done through Empower has looked
  • 47:44at patient satisfaction
  • 47:46or or quality of life,
  • 47:48like, how satisfied is the
  • 47:49person with the pain the
  • 47:50quality of pain care that
  • 47:52they're receiving
  • 47:54for an individual with opioid
  • 47:56use disorder, and I think
  • 47:57that's a notable
  • 47:59gap that we don't we
  • 48:00don't really know
  • 48:02how people are doing
  • 48:05in regard to pain specifically
  • 48:07when they have a pain
  • 48:09condition and OUD.
  • 48:13Thank you.
  • 48:15Shelly Sue asked, does the
  • 48:16review tell us how well
  • 48:18hospitals
  • 48:19are maintaining people on MOUD
  • 48:21versus removing them?
  • 48:28Alyssa might be better equipped
  • 48:30to answer this question than
  • 48:31I, but,
  • 48:32the review did not specifically
  • 48:34address
  • 48:37that. We did hope to
  • 48:40look at that in terms
  • 48:41of, when we separated our
  • 48:43findings by MOUD management being,
  • 48:46continuing, discontinuing, or altering someone's
  • 48:49baseline MOUD when in acute
  • 48:52pain and then other interventions.
  • 48:56But I
  • 48:57I think what you're getting
  • 48:58at is if we have
  • 48:59a sense for what the
  • 49:00current standard of practice is
  • 49:03using these studies as to
  • 49:06how people are most often
  • 49:07managed,
  • 49:08when they come in, and
  • 49:09I
  • 49:10I don't think we got
  • 49:11that answer.
  • 49:15I would say as a
  • 49:15group, most of the studies
  • 49:18seem to be most interested
  • 49:19in how do you
  • 49:21successfully continue someone on their
  • 49:24MOUD.
  • 49:26Though there weren't many about
  • 49:27initiation,
  • 49:30it did seem to be
  • 49:31a question that people are
  • 49:32grappling with. There there weren't
  • 49:35I don't remember any studies
  • 49:37that talked about complete discontinuation
  • 49:41of
  • 49:42MOD.
  • 49:44I think most people are
  • 49:45grappling with how do we
  • 49:47safely continue
  • 49:48particularly the buprenorphine
  • 49:50and still have good pain
  • 49:51relief. And thankfully, many of
  • 49:53the studies show that that's
  • 49:54very possible to do and
  • 49:56and consistent with current
  • 49:58guidance, albeit,
  • 50:00you know, we don't have
  • 50:01a great evidence base for
  • 50:03it. So I would say
  • 50:04by and large, it seems
  • 50:06like people are getting the
  • 50:08message, though I still think
  • 50:09there's a lot of misinformation
  • 50:11out there
  • 50:13about buprenorphine continuation
  • 50:15and methadone continuation.
  • 50:17I don't think anybody thinks
  • 50:18you should discontinue methadone if
  • 50:20somebody's been,
  • 50:22stable on it, but
  • 50:25you know, I don't make
  • 50:26many assumptions like that anymore.
  • 50:27Yeah. Though
  • 50:29that's a good point. Unless
  • 50:30I I guess I will
  • 50:32argue
  • 50:32in,
  • 50:34as a, you know, as
  • 50:35a result of our understanding
  • 50:36what happens
  • 50:37in our own state.
  • 50:39I think it's probably very
  • 50:41hyperlocal,
  • 50:43decision. You can have two
  • 50:44hospitals in the same city
  • 50:46that have completely
  • 50:48disparate protocols with respect to
  • 50:51continuation versus,
  • 50:53tapering or discontinuation.
  • 50:55So I
  • 50:57my I think the the
  • 50:59short answer to Shelley is
  • 51:00there's huge amount of practice
  • 51:02variation
  • 51:03that is very much institutionally
  • 51:05determined, and, unfortunately,
  • 51:07not as many patients are
  • 51:08continued as we would expect
  • 51:10around the country at large.
  • 51:13Definitely.
  • 51:13And this this will actually
  • 51:15answer,
  • 51:16the another question that patients
  • 51:18had was how many of
  • 51:20these studies were outside the
  • 51:21US? I will say in
  • 51:22the non US studies, it
  • 51:24was very rare for those
  • 51:25people to be started on
  • 51:27any form of MOUD,
  • 51:30and most of these individuals
  • 51:31were treated
  • 51:32The majority of them were
  • 51:34in treated in Iran.
  • 51:36There was one study in
  • 51:37Egypt, I believe.
  • 51:39That's right. And interestingly,
  • 51:41almost a hundred percent of
  • 51:43the people in the study
  • 51:44were male.
  • 51:46So a hundred percent men
  • 51:47who used opium,
  • 51:50not
  • 51:51opioids, not heroin, not fentanyl,
  • 51:53opium
  • 51:54in Iran
  • 51:56coming in with a traumatic
  • 51:58injury.
  • 52:00That was what the majority
  • 52:01of those studies were. But
  • 52:03those were all the studies
  • 52:04that were actually looking at
  • 52:05some of these non,
  • 52:08opioid interventions, which is kind
  • 52:10of interesting. So you do
  • 52:11have to think about generalizability.
  • 52:14The total number of those
  • 52:15studies, there were maybe
  • 52:18ten, Michelle.
  • 52:21I think,
  • 52:23the rest were from were
  • 52:24from the US.
  • 52:26That's right.
  • 52:27Yeah. So
  • 52:28interesting. And then because I
  • 52:30know we're out of time.
  • 52:31I saw Natalie's question about
  • 52:34the benefits of regional blocks,
  • 52:36on acute pain. And I
  • 52:38think this is a really
  • 52:39important question and something that
  • 52:40I'm always advocating for our
  • 52:42patients who
  • 52:44have OUD. Because if you
  • 52:45can,
  • 52:46you know, block someone's foot
  • 52:48who has osteo in their
  • 52:49foot,
  • 52:50you can really improve their,
  • 52:52their pain, or at least
  • 52:53we think you can improve
  • 52:54their pain.
  • 52:56Unfortunately,
  • 52:56most of those studies, and
  • 52:58this would be something that
  • 52:59I would hope Natalie would
  • 53:01want to study in the
  • 53:02future,
  • 53:04most of those studies were
  • 53:05only looking at block duration.
  • 53:09They weren't actually looking at
  • 53:10pain outcomes.
  • 53:12So we don't wanna just
  • 53:13know how long did the
  • 53:15block last. We wanna know
  • 53:16how it helped the patient.
  • 53:18And so
  • 53:19though there are block studies,
  • 53:22they were limited in the
  • 53:23outcomes that we could look
  • 53:24at.
  • 53:25I would actually be happy
  • 53:27to share some of those
  • 53:27studies with anybody interested because,
  • 53:30Tom Hickey was our anesthesia
  • 53:32colleague
  • 53:33on this
  • 53:34review, and we we did
  • 53:35have amongst the authors and
  • 53:37then with the editorial team
  • 53:38of the journal a bit
  • 53:39of a debate about whether
  • 53:41duration of block is a
  • 53:43sufficiently pain related outcome to
  • 53:46include in the study and
  • 53:47report on.
  • 53:48And we ended up concluding
  • 53:50that if postoperative
  • 53:52pain itself was measured and
  • 53:54reported, that was sufficient. But
  • 53:56if it was just duration
  • 53:58of block, it was not.
  • 53:59But we did find a
  • 54:00number of studies, including about,
  • 54:03lidocaine infusions intraoperatively,
  • 54:06as they relate to postoperative,
  • 54:08block, and perhaps you could
  • 54:10transferably say pain,
  • 54:12and I'd be happy to
  • 54:13kinda dig those up and,
  • 54:15share them with folks.
  • 54:18Yeah. Shelley gets the last
  • 54:20question. She says the MME
  • 54:22levels across MOUDs
  • 54:24seem to show that there
  • 54:25isn't a direct relationship between
  • 54:27MOUD type and MME
  • 54:30slash pain control,
  • 54:32assuming that the MMEs
  • 54:34may not be calculated the
  • 54:36same across studies.
  • 54:39I love this comment, Shelley,
  • 54:40I will say.
  • 54:42I got down a whole
  • 54:43rabbit hole with this and
  • 54:45made tables on tables of
  • 54:48looking at how each
  • 54:50study calculated their MMEs. Did
  • 54:51they include methadone? Did they
  • 54:53include buprenorphine? Did they not?
  • 54:55And it was honestly, it
  • 54:57was so
  • 54:58the the heterogeneity
  • 54:59made it impossible
  • 55:01to compare,
  • 55:02in any meaningful way. And
  • 55:04so the best we could
  • 55:06do is just kinda report
  • 55:07a range, and you can
  • 55:08even see the range. I
  • 55:08mean, the range in methadone,
  • 55:10five to seven hundred
  • 55:12MMEs per day,
  • 55:14is quite a wide range.
  • 55:16And so I I don't
  • 55:17think there is data yet
  • 55:18to support that it differs
  • 55:21by MOUD.
  • 55:22However,
  • 55:23I
  • 55:24am not confident
  • 55:27that we can
  • 55:28say we've sufficiently
  • 55:30determined that there isn't. I
  • 55:31think it's just that the
  • 55:33the data is too
  • 55:35heterogeneous
  • 55:36at this time.
  • 55:38And I I would be
  • 55:39interested in a more rigorous,
  • 55:41comparison.
  • 55:44I don't know if you
  • 55:45wanna add to that, Melissa.
  • 55:47I would just say, though,
  • 55:48right, we did find studies
  • 55:50that
  • 55:51that helped us rigorously answer
  • 55:53this question.
  • 55:55I would say in my
  • 55:56clinical practice,
  • 55:57interestingly,
  • 55:58I am seeing individuals
  • 56:00who are treating with methadone
  • 56:02need much higher doses
  • 56:05of full agonist
  • 56:06than those who are are
  • 56:08receiving buprenorphine.
  • 56:09And I think some of
  • 56:10that could be related
  • 56:12to some of the hyperalgesia
  • 56:13that we see with methadone
  • 56:15and the need to overcome
  • 56:17the
  • 56:18blockade
  • 56:19of methadone, which I think
  • 56:20actually,
  • 56:22strangely, is higher than with
  • 56:24buprenorphine.
  • 56:26And so,
  • 56:28you know, we've been
  • 56:29in our practice seeing individuals
  • 56:32postoperatively,
  • 56:34say, going through cardiac surgery,
  • 56:36if they are treated with
  • 56:37methadone, it's gonna be much,
  • 56:39much harder to get their
  • 56:40acute pain under control than
  • 56:41if they are treated with
  • 56:42buprenorphine.
  • 56:44We're actually able to get
  • 56:45their pain under control with,
  • 56:48much fewer
  • 56:49lower doses of opioids. So
  • 56:52I think there's
  • 56:53that is a huge open
  • 56:55question that I think,
  • 56:57would be great to to
  • 56:59be able to have more
  • 57:00rigorous study about.
  • 57:02Wonderful. Thank you everybody for
  • 57:03joining. Thank you, Michelle and
  • 57:05Melissa.
  • 57:07I think you all see
  • 57:08that there's a research road
  • 57:09map that has just been
  • 57:11outlined for you. Emergency medicine,
  • 57:14anesthesiology,
  • 57:16hospitalist,
  • 57:17addiction medicine.
  • 57:19Go forth and,
  • 57:21prosper.
  • 57:22Thank you, everybody.